Blogging your day job away...?
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:28 pm
I recently had the very pleasant experience of being informed I was to be paid in excess of $1,000 for a poem that consisted only of 28 fairly short lines, and had taken me about twenty minutes to write. What was even more suprising was that the poem had never been published, nor I had ever performed it publicly.
How could this possibly be?
The answer is as follows. Three years ago I received a phone call from a friend who is a drama teacher. She had a request. She was coaching a young girl to recite a poem for an Eisteddfod. For some reason, the girl was keen to recite a poem about a donkey, and my friend wanted to know if I knew any. I answered that the obvious choice would be 'Simpson and his donkey'. 'Yes,' replied my friend, 'but that's a story, not a poem', to which I responded, 'I'll write you one.' Twenty minutes later I emailed the poem to my friend. The feedback I received was that both my friend and her student liked the poem. The girl recited it at the Eisteddfod. She didn't win, but the judge appreciated that she was reciting a poem that had been specially written for her. End of story...but wait!
Two years ago, I started a blog. The idea was that I would post a bunch of poems, together with some information about each poem - why I had written the way I had, why I had written it all, etc. I worked solidly for about three months and posted about a hundred poems, including 'Simpson and his donkey'. At that point I stopped, because I was not quite sure what I was trying to achieve, and was not getting much feedback - at least after the initial burst of enthusiasm from friends.
I have left the blog hanging in cyberspace, however (continued to pay my fees), because the one function it does serve is to act as a sort of 'calling card' for people who want to know more about me and my poetry.
Enter CAL (Copyright Agency Limited). The role of this organisation, amongst other things, is to survey educational institutions to discover examples of written works being photocopied for educational use in the classroom. They then distribute money from a central fund they receive from the government to the authors, according to a formula they have devised.
My poem had turned up on one of their surveys! Twenty copies had been photocopied for classroom use (presumably in relation to Anzac Day), and I was to be paid approx. $50 per copy! Now, this strikes me as extremely generous. On the other hand, of course, I can see that it also compensates me - well, partially - for all the times others have used my work - with or without my permission - without me receiving any payment at all.
The school must have found the poem on my blog.
I feel there is a moral to this story, but I can't quite put my finger on what it is. My suspicion is that there is a great deal of money to be made by poets via the internet if we can just discover the knack. Perhaps this will become clearer in time.
Comments/suggestions welcome.
By the way, if you want to have a look at my blog, you can find it here:
http://www.stephenwhitesidepoet.com/
How could this possibly be?
The answer is as follows. Three years ago I received a phone call from a friend who is a drama teacher. She had a request. She was coaching a young girl to recite a poem for an Eisteddfod. For some reason, the girl was keen to recite a poem about a donkey, and my friend wanted to know if I knew any. I answered that the obvious choice would be 'Simpson and his donkey'. 'Yes,' replied my friend, 'but that's a story, not a poem', to which I responded, 'I'll write you one.' Twenty minutes later I emailed the poem to my friend. The feedback I received was that both my friend and her student liked the poem. The girl recited it at the Eisteddfod. She didn't win, but the judge appreciated that she was reciting a poem that had been specially written for her. End of story...but wait!
Two years ago, I started a blog. The idea was that I would post a bunch of poems, together with some information about each poem - why I had written the way I had, why I had written it all, etc. I worked solidly for about three months and posted about a hundred poems, including 'Simpson and his donkey'. At that point I stopped, because I was not quite sure what I was trying to achieve, and was not getting much feedback - at least after the initial burst of enthusiasm from friends.
I have left the blog hanging in cyberspace, however (continued to pay my fees), because the one function it does serve is to act as a sort of 'calling card' for people who want to know more about me and my poetry.
Enter CAL (Copyright Agency Limited). The role of this organisation, amongst other things, is to survey educational institutions to discover examples of written works being photocopied for educational use in the classroom. They then distribute money from a central fund they receive from the government to the authors, according to a formula they have devised.
My poem had turned up on one of their surveys! Twenty copies had been photocopied for classroom use (presumably in relation to Anzac Day), and I was to be paid approx. $50 per copy! Now, this strikes me as extremely generous. On the other hand, of course, I can see that it also compensates me - well, partially - for all the times others have used my work - with or without my permission - without me receiving any payment at all.
The school must have found the poem on my blog.
I feel there is a moral to this story, but I can't quite put my finger on what it is. My suspicion is that there is a great deal of money to be made by poets via the internet if we can just discover the knack. Perhaps this will become clearer in time.
Comments/suggestions welcome.
By the way, if you want to have a look at my blog, you can find it here:
http://www.stephenwhitesidepoet.com/