Martyboy wrote: too much thought on the subject is actually harmful
I'll have to be in disagreement with you on that Marty.
We need to do a lot of thinking.
If you mean, too much thinking about how to fit into rules and criteria, then I am in agreement with you there.
And I agree , if you mean, you don't need the perfect metre or rhyme or technical structure. But I think that you DO NEED the perfect word or the perfect phrase, which is one that fits what you are trying to write.
Consider John O'Brien's phrases. The phrases he used in Said Hanrahan are short and direct, very different from the lyrical phrases he used in The Old Bush School when he talked about the young girl that he had admired.
That's what I am talking about. The best words in the best order for the mood and feeling of the poem. Not just a word or phrase chosen because it has the right rhyme or number of syllables and has a dictionary meaning close enough to pass on the general idea.
And what do people remember about the classic bush poems ? A word or a phrase usually. Just about anyone knows the first line of The Man from Snowy River, or Said Hanrahan or My Country ( usually the second stanza ), because they are memorable words and phrases carefully chosen for impact. Not necessarily fancy or obscure or " academic" words..
THINK ON THESE THINGS, BUSH POETS.
Zondrae, your poem about the trapped miner is excellent. You don't need to compare it with anything, it stands on its own merit, no problem.
I agree with Heather and Robyn. I think writing specifically for competitions tends to limit creativity. I guess there are exceptions, there always will be.